God versus Reality

So this is a rare double post day, enjoy it while it lasts. These events occurred after the events chronicled in the previous post. In fact they went down right afterward. We left the after party at ACME and headed off to a party that a friend of Jenny's was throwing. It was a pretty boring party. I'd only met a few of the people before. They were pretty tame. In fact the events for the night went as follows.
I drank my first beer, and started to heckle the hostess. She decides we should play Mafia, and so we do. All the while I'm getting more boisterous. I get killed by the Mafia guy (actually pretty stupid on his part due to the fact that the suspicions of the previous round had been split between me and another girl, with her getting wrongly accused. Even money says I would have been accused next). Thankfully this lead to my second beer. The game ends, I might have done some more heckling.
Another game, this time one called What If? Another beer for me. The rules of this game are simple, you write down a question on a piece of paper. Everyone exchanges papers, and answer the question they got. The papers are mixed up and a person reads the question and the person next to them reads their answer (which doesn't even match the question, get it?) and hilarity ensues (or more accurately, doesn't).
Game over. More beer and it's almost time to leave. The hostess is chatting with us. She says that since her apartment is small, she split up her house warming party into two groups (I forgot to mention that it was a house warming party, didn't I? Oh well, now you know). We got invited to this one instead of the other party when her 25 friends from a church group will be there. Jenny jokes that we love church people. I ask if they believe in evolution, and if not, could I lecture them about it? The hostess defensively says that she believes in evolution. Jenny slaps me, and we make a quick get away.
In the car she tells me I suck, and that the girl sitting next to her believes in natural selection but not in evolution (umm, yeah). A mini argument wages on the car ride home, with me eventually being called intolerant. Blah, blah, blah.
Anyway, here's the thing. Something like 48% of our country say they don't believe in evolution. What? Ummm, I hate to tell you this, but evolution isn't like faeries or mermaids. It's not something you get to choose whether or not you believe. Evolution is as close to fact as things come in science. Saying you don't believe in evolution is pretty much equivalent to saying you don't believe in gravity. Both can be directly observed. Both have been tested and examined empirically many times, with neither of them ever being disproved. And don't even get me started on someone saying they believe in natural selection but not in evolution. That's like saying I don't believe in the constitution, but I believe in the first amendment. It doesn't really work that way.
Now I could go into the examples that demonstrate both evolution and natural selection in action, such as antibiotic selection of bacteria. But a simple Internet search should yield all the results you could possibly desire (assuming someone who disbelieves in evolution is smart enough to be able to identify whether or not a website is a trust worthy source).Really what the so called debate that delusional people think is going on between scientists and creationist (cause really scientist should hardly think it's worth debating) about whether evolution is in fact true comes down to misunderstanding of semantics. For some reason some people refuse to accept the simple precept of science that nothing can ever be proven, things can only be disproven. Therefore evolution gets named as a theory. This is not because there is a doubt of whether or not evolution occurs, but in fact due to the very nature of science itself. If a system dictates that nothing can ever be definitively proven, then how are you to ever say that something is true beyond doubt? Science says you can't, even with something like evolution that is very well documented. It is in fact the cornerstone on which all of modern biology is built (including by the way medicine). So maybe if you don't believe in evolution, you shouldn't believe in modern medicine either.
Anyway, I don't really want to debate the merit of evolution. I know it has, does, and will continue to occur. Maybe this makes me seem as fanatical as the loonies I am currently decrying, but then at least my viewpoint can be directly observed. What I want to say is that this has become a litmus test for me (and I know that if you follow politics the litmus test has gotten a bad name, as in a simple yes or no situation. But in fact the litmus test is still a useful and easy way of measuring pH, so think of it in that sense). If a person does not"believe" in evolution, or worse yet believes in just natural selection (a cowardly attempt to stave off debate), or worst of all intelligent design (seriously, lets take some aspects of the reality, taint them and try and pass them off as science, even though our basic precept is untestable and therefore by definition can not ever be science) I automatic discount all of their opinions. Maybe this makes me a judgmental fuck, but you know what? I don't care. If you choose to disbelieve reality, I should trust your opinion? Yeah, no thanks.




